Search for: All records

Floods are amplified and attenuated by features and processes across spatial scales, defined here as flood dynamics. We review and synthesise these influences at the catchment, river network and reach scales as a means of integrating understanding of controls on flood dynamics and identifying key questions that arise because of differences in techniques of investigation and disciplinary emphases between spatial scales. Catchment‐scale influences include catchment area, topography, lithology, land cover, precipitation, antecedent conditions and human alterations such as changing land cover. Network‐scale influences on flood dynamics include network topology, longitudinal variations in the geometry of successive river corridor reaches, lakes and wetlands and human alterations including flow regulation and cumulative changes in channel‐floodplain connectivity in multiple reaches across a network. Reach‐scale influences on flood dynamics include water sources, river corridor geometry and connectivity and human alterations such as artificial levees, channelisation, bank stabilisation, changes to floodplain land cover and drainage, dike operation, process‐based river restoration and urban stormwater management. Our review and synthesis of relevant literature suggest that the relative importance of these multiple influences on flood dynamics varies across spatial scales. Hillslope response may dominate hydrograph characteristics in smaller catchments, for example, whereas network geometry and flow dynamics exert progressively stronger influences on flood dynamics with increasing catchment size. Scale‐specific advances in understanding flood dynamics, including rainfall‐runoff analyses of water movements from uplands into channel networks (catchment‐scale), analyses of flow dynamics along networks of multiple channel reaches (network‐scale) and investigations of biophysical feedbacks and the influences of river corridor geometry and hydraulic roughness (reach‐scale), have largely contributed to understanding flood dynamics, but there remain important disconnects between these diverse bodies of research and outstanding questions related to the cumulative effects on flood dynamics across scales. 

Wide, low-gradient segments within river networks (i.e., beads) play a critical role in absorbing and morphologically adapting to disturbances, including wildfires and debris flows. However, the magnitude and rate of morphological adjustment and subsequent hydraulic conditions provided by beads compared to pre-disturbance conditions are not well understood. This study analysed trajectories of river morphology, flood attenuation and hydraulic fish habitat following the 2020 Cameron Peak Fire and July 2022 debris flow and flood at Little Beaver Creek, Colorado, USA. Using repeat aerial imagery, ground-based surveys and hydrodynamic modelling, we assessed morphological changes in a 600-m-long bead of Little Beaver Creek. Metrics of floodplain destruction and formation and channel migration greatly increased in magnitude after the first post-fire runoff season but returned to the historical range of these metrics three years after the fire. The 2022 flood deposited sediment, infilled side channels, reduced pool area and increased the area of bars and islands. Flood wave attenuation and hydraulic habitat conditions did not show clear improvement or impairment despite more rapid changes in system geometry, geomorphic unit abundance and geomorphic unit location. The ability of the site to attenuate peak flows changed minimally and inconsistently over the studied floods. Various lotic habitat conditions changed—namely a reduction in floodplain access and deepening of certain pools—but the overall flow-type diversity of the system was not largely impacted. The resilience of the active channel of Little Beaver Creek to the fire and flood disturbances while retaining key services demonstrates the importance of river beads for enhancing river-floodplain resilience to large disturbance events and highlights river beads as key areas for preservation and restoration. 

The dynamic environment of natural river 昀氀oodplains creates spatial heterogeneity that in昀氀uences 昀氀oodplain functions. Diverse human activities have homogenized natural 昀氀oodplains and reduced their functions across many river networks in the temperate latitudes. Consequently, quanti昀椀cation of 昀氀oodplain heterogeneity is needed to understand patterns of spatial heterogeneity on diverse 昀氀oodplains and to inform 昀氀oodplain restoration. We use a novel approach of spatially connecting 昀椀eld and remotely sensed data in order to interpret the output of, and build upon, a previous unsupervised classi昀椀cation work昀氀ow. We apply the method to three rivers in the US Paci昀椀c Northwest and the Altamaha River in the southeastern US and compare our results to a previous study. We 昀椀nd that 昀椀eld classi昀椀cations, relative topography, and NDVI are useful for interpreting results from the unsupervised classi昀椀cation work昀氀ow. The interpretations are visually interesting, but we propose that it is the heterogeneity within the groups that is vital to 昀氀oodplain functioning. Natural 昀氀oodplains in the Paci昀椀c Northwest and coastal Southeast have moderate to high evenness, moderate to high intermixing, and moderate aggregation; and aggregation and evenness similar to rivers in Colorado and Oklahoma, USA, but lower intermixing. We attribute lower intermixing at the Altamaha River to slower rates of lateral channel migration, and lower intermixing at the Hoh River to the different hydrologic and sediment regimes and less stable braided planform. The results show that the larger rivers in this study (Altamaha, Hoh, and Sol Duc Rivers) have spatial heterogeneity similar to beaver-modi昀椀ed and shortgrass prairie rivers in Colorado, whereas the more inland and smaller river (Lookout Creek) has spatial heterogeneity similar to the tallgrass prairie site (Sand Creek). From the results of an ad hoc sensitivity analysis, we suggest using the highest spatial resolution topographic data available, using aerial imagery/mosaics from the same sensor, and removing largest patch index from the suite of comparable indices. The metrics reveal similarities and differences between rivers in the United States, and indicate that discernable trends may arise from a meta study comparing heterogeneity from more rivers across the country. 

Abstract Wide, low‐gradient segments within river networks (i.e., beads) play a critical role in absorbing and morphologically adapting to disturbances, including wildfires and debris flows. However, the magnitude and rate of morphological adjustment and subsequent hydraulic conditions provided by beads compared to pre‐disturbance conditions are not well understood. This study analysed trajectories of river morphology, flood attenuation and hydraulic fish habitat following the 2020 Cameron Peak Fire and July 2022 debris flow and flood at Little Beaver Creek, Colorado, USA. Using repeat aerial imagery, ground‐based surveys and hydrodynamic modelling, we assessed morphological changes in a 600‐m‐long bead of Little Beaver Creek. Metrics of floodplain destruction and formation and channel migration greatly increased in magnitude after the first post‐fire runoff season but returned to the historical range of these metrics three years after the fire. The 2022 flood deposited sediment, infilled side channels, reduced pool area and increased the area of bars and islands. Flood wave attenuation and hydraulic habitat conditions did not show clear improvement or impairment despite more rapid changes in system geometry, geomorphic unit abundance and geomorphic unit location. The ability of the site to attenuate peak flows changed minimally and inconsistently over the studied floods. Various lotic habitat conditions changed—namely a reduction in floodplain access and deepening of certain pools—but the overall flow‐type diversity of the system was not largely impacted. The resilience of the active channel of Little Beaver Creek to the fire and flood disturbances while retaining key services demonstrates the importance of river beads for enhancing river‐floodplain resilience to large disturbance events and highlights river beads as key areas for preservation and restoration. 

River corridors integrate the active channels, geomorphic floodplain and riparian areas, and hyporheic zone while receiving inputs from the uplands and groundwater and exchanging mass and energy with the atmosphere. Here, we trace the development of the contemporary understanding of river corridors from the perspectives of geomorphology, hydrology, ecology, and biogeochemistry. We then summarize contemporary models of the river corridor along multiple axes including dimensions of space and time, disturbance regimes, connectivity, hydrochemical exchange flows, and legacy effects of humans. We explore how river corridor science can be advanced with a critical zone framework by moving beyond a primary focus on discharge-based controls toward multi-factor models that identify dominant processes and thresholds that make predictions that serve society. We then identify opportunities to investigate relationships between large-scale spatial gradients and local-scale processes, embrace that riverine processes are temporally variable and interacting, acknowledge that river corridor processes and services do not respect disciplinary boundaries and increasingly need integrated multidisciplinary investigations, and explicitly integrate humans and their management actions as part of the river corridor. We intend our review to stimulate cross-disciplinary research while recognizing that river corridors occupy a unique position on the Earth's surface. 

This analysis of artificial levee impacts on floodplains in the contiguous United States reveals some unexpected results. 

Abstract Riparian zones are a critical terrestrial‐aquatic ecotone. They play important roles in ecosystems including (1) harboring biodiversity, (2) influencing light and carbon fluxes to aquatic food webs, (3) maintaining water quality and streamflow, (4) enhancing aquatic habitat, (5) influencing greenhouse gas production, and (6) sequestering carbon. Defining what qualifies as a riparian zone is a first step to delineation. Many definitions of riparian boundaries focus on static attributes or a subset of potential functions without recognizing that they are spatially continuous, temporally dynamic, and multi‐dimensional. We emphasize that definitions should consider multiple ecological and biogeochemical functions and physical gradients, and explore how this approach influences spatial characterization of riparian zones. One or more of the following properties can guide riparian delineation: (1) distinct species, elevated biodiversity, or species with specific adaptations to flooding and inundation near streams relative to nearby upland areas; (2) unique vegetation structure directly influencing irradiance or organic material inputs to aquatic ecosystems; (3) hydrologic and geomorphic features or processes maintaining floodplains; (4) hydric soil properties that differ from the uplands; and/or (5) elevated retention of dissolved and suspended materials relative to adjacent uplands. Considering these properties for an operational and dynamic definition of riparian zones recognizes that riparian boundaries vary in space (e.g., variation of riparian corridor widths within or among watersheds) and time (e.g., responses to hydrological variance and climate change). Inclusive definitions addressing multiple riparian functions could facilitate attainment of research and management goals by linking properties of interest to specific outcomes.